Featured
Table of Contents
Especially CMOs and those accountable for a business's marketing success. AI-generated responses appear like a direct threat to the traditional natural traffic sites utilized to receive from search engines. Before, you had to click a site to see the outcomes. Today, LLMs just rip the content on sites and individuals no longer need to visit a website anymore.
While I personally think this risk is blown completely out of proportion (based on data from sites I've personally seen), I don't believe it's a reason to overlook it completely. From my own experience growing both blogs and YouTube channels, especially to offer something, I can tell you that video converts way more than composed material.
And the audience can select up on more subtleties in your message. It's a lot simpler to inform if someone is lying or loaded with it if you can see their facial expressions and their tone of voice. So YouTube ought to absolutely remain in your SEO and material strategy. Use video as need generation and a way to construct trust with an audience.
And due to the fact that you have constructed the trust with video, your conventional SEO efforts will transform much better. There's even more to it. Previously this year, I had a hunch that if I turned some of my best ranking article into YouTube videos, and embedded them into my existing article, my article would rank even better.
Optimizing for GEO and New AI Search EnginesI used rank in between 2-3 for the keyword "AI marketing tools." I made a YouTube video about the topic, embedded it into that post, and I've been ranking # 1 given that. So in 2026, believe of YouTube videos as a way to boost your SEO blog posts to rank even much better.
Keep concentrating on Google, which still owns 90% of search market share. Buy AI search experiments if you have budget, however do not abandon what's actually driving traffic and conversions today. In 2025, we saw everyone discussing how AI search was going to take over Google. Beyond just SEO, the marketing neighborhood as a whole begun to get bombarded with influencers trying to ride the AI hype train.
It ended up being hard to discover trusted sources that weren't biased or had a prejudice to sell us something. While I do think there are benefits to utilizing LLMs in our workflows, I do think it has actually been overhyped. And in 2026, I anticipate lots of online marketers will recognize that ChatGPT and Perplexity are just a little part of the SEO market.
Google still dominates 90% market share and with its AI Mode and AI Overviews, it's in the best position to win the AI online search engine race. Search habits hasn't basically moved away from Google. Beyond just that, there are a few things that have rubbed me the wrong way about the AI SEO trend.
What these marketers don't recognize is that Things like homepages, pricing pages, or bottom of funnel material, tends to be revealed in ChatGPT. The informative top of funnel material is "consumed up" by LLMs and shown to users without anywhere to click.
If you were to take that very same principle over to Google, you would see the same conversion rates. Google's conversion rates reveal less due to the fact that the traffic is higher due to it being watered down by all the top of funnel content that is in the formula. Other things like how ChatGPT can make things up, it never totally follows triggers properly (i.e.
I do still think that larger companies will set aside an experimental budget plan to check things like ChatGPT apps and other AI SEO tools. In 2026, I anticipate people will recognize enhancing for Google will enable them to show up in ChatGPT and Perplexity. Just look at ChatGPT Atlas or Perplexity's Comet web browsers.
Don't do it. These tactics might work now in ChatGPT and other LLMs, but they're short-term plays that will eventually get penalized. Concentrate on white hat techniques that build real authority and trust over time rather of chasing after fast wins that will not last. The 2000s are back. Scammy keyword stuffing tactics, spending for low-grade backlinks, shipping thousands of worthless short articles all in the name of ranking high.
Now, the algorithm is fully grown enough to overlook all that nonsense. ChatGPT and other LLM algorithms are not as mature. I can't call this person, however I satisfied an SEO director at a substantial banking business. This individual told me they (and all their rivals) are creating microsites (like small blogs) on various domains.
And from there, they are using their main business domain, that has an incredibly strong brand name authority, and sending backlinks to the microsite. And this has actually resulted in higher rankings for their brand in LLMs like ChatGPT.It blew my mind that substantial, trusted companies are doing this. And I recognized just how much black hat (or grey hat) techniques are going on behind the scenes.
In 2026, I predict these methods will continue to happen. Up until ChatGPT's algorithm gets as clever as Google's search algorithm.
Focus on quality over quantity. Share genuine insights, use your own images and videos, and build topical authority in your specific niche. This is how solo creators and small teams can beat huge brand names in 2026. Niche blogging is back baby. However with a twist. This is among the most significant SEO patterns for content marketing I'm seeing today.
You require a genuine service, be it a newsletter business, a service-based company, SaaS company, or ecommerce shop. And then you add on this human-centered niche blogging to the website to organically grow your core product/service offering. In 2026, I anticipate that Google's algorithm will continue to get smarter about which websites consist of AI material and which don't.
I understand tons of people silently squashing it with AI produced material (even going after top of funnel keywords). What I am stating is that engaging, human content will outrank AI created content with no initial insights. There are 2 paths I see with SEO's right now: Produce countless AI-generated blog site posts and get them to rank in the middle/bottom of page 1.
Produce a hundred human article and get them to rank at the top of the very first page. Quality over amount. The first path is based on sheer volume, and can cause traffic development. You do run the risk of a potential algorithm upgrade hurting your rankings. And anyone who writes much better human material will rank greater in positions 1-3. The 2nd route is slower, but can yield greater ranking positions and more trust with readers.
Latest Posts
Dominating Voice-Search Queries
Essential Tools to Unify Sales and Lead Teams
Boosting Organic Traffic Through Advanced GEO Tactics
